Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 10:03:43 -0400 From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@bimajority.org> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Frequent hickups on the networking layer Message-ID: <21824.58559.694680.131913@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmonNKqiz-r6NHykc3WWebGuAO4B-JMKaqjygtW=JxZx-xg@mail.gmail.com> References: <4281350517-9417@kerio.tuxis.nl> <137094161.27589033.1430255162390.JavaMail.root@uoguelph.ca> <21824.26416.855441.21454@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> <CAJ-VmonNKqiz-r6NHykc3WWebGuAO4B-JMKaqjygtW=JxZx-xg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Tue, 28 Apr 2015 23:37:22 -0700, Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> said: > - as you said, like ~ 64k), and allocate that way. That way there's no > fragmentation to worry about - everything's just using a custom slab > allocator for these large allocation sizes. > It's kind of tempting to suggest freebsd support such a thing, as I > can see increasing requirements for specialised applications that want > this. I think this would be an Extremely Good Thing if someone has the cycles to implement it, and teach some of the popular network interfaces to use it. -GAWollman
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?21824.58559.694680.131913>