From owner-freebsd-current Sat Dec 11 9: 2:33 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from tantivy.stanford.edu (tantivy.Stanford.EDU [36.118.0.70]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AEAA14FA3 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 1999 09:02:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from techie@tantivy.stanford.edu) Received: (from techie@localhost) by tantivy.stanford.edu (8.9.3/8.9.1) id JAA34096; Sat, 11 Dec 1999 09:00:52 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 11 Dec 1999 09:00:52 -0800 (PST) From: Bob Vaughan Message-Id: <199912111700.JAA34096@tantivy.stanford.edu> To: nate@mt.sri.com, phk@critter.freebsd.dk Subject: Re: HEADSUP: wd driver will be retired! Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <6332.944849983@critter.freebsd.dk> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: Re: HEADSUP: wd driver will be retired! > Date: Fri, 10 Dec 1999 19:19:43 +0100 > From: Poul-Henning Kamp > > > Maybe we should put a special marker in -currents sendmail and > reject all email to the current list if they don't originate > from such a system. > > Bad idea.. this would create problems for people who run -current, but read mail on -stable boxes.. If -current is broken, how are they going to report it? -- Welcome My Son, Welcome To The Machine -- Bob Vaughan | techie@{w6yx|tantivy}.stanford.edu | kc6sxc@w6yx.ampr.org | P.O. Box 9792, Stanford, Ca 94309-9792 -- I am Me, I am only Me, And no one else is Me, What could be simpler? -- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message