From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Mar 8 11:38:46 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from hp9000.chc-chimes.com (hp9000.chc-chimes.com [206.67.97.84]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8D7F153F2 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 11:37:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from billf@chc-chimes.com) Received: from localhost by hp9000.chc-chimes.com with SMTP (1.39.111.2/16.2) id AA061549735; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 14:02:15 -0500 Date: Mon, 8 Mar 1999 14:02:15 -0500 (EST) From: Bill Fumerola To: Joe Abley Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: base64 In-Reply-To: <19990309024429.A95913@clear.co.nz> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 9 Mar 1999, Joe Abley wrote: > ... what's wrong with csh? We have csh in the tree. It's in the root > filesystem. Although I have certainly written bourne scripts galore, > I tend to write ad-hoc scripts in csh because that's what I use as > my shell, and hence that's what any interactive scripts are written > in. What's so great about sh? Prorgramming anything in csh(1) is a Bad Thing. - bill fumerola - billf@chc-chimes.com - BF1560 - computer horizons corp - - ph:(800) 252-2421 - bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - billf@FreeBSD.org - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message