From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Nov 28 9:43:44 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D03137B402 for ; Tue, 28 Nov 2000 09:43:38 -0800 (PST) Received: (from bright@localhost) by fw.wintelcom.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id eASHhHh14698; Tue, 28 Nov 2000 09:43:17 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 09:43:17 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein To: Matthew West Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: quota and NFS Message-ID: <20001128094317.H8051@fw.wintelcom.net> References: <20001128153456.A32289@apotheosis.org.za> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20001128153456.A32289@apotheosis.org.za>; from mwest@uct.ac.za on Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 03:34:56PM +0200 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Matthew West [001128 05:35] wrote: > Who do I prod to get someone to take a look at bin/12939 and bin/6183? > > I've been using both patches now since FreeBSD 4.0 and they make life > a lot more pleasant when using quota on a machine with NFS mounts. These both look sorta hackish, if you could somehow figure a way to determine if a mount is hung instead of these two fixes it would be a lot better. bin/12939: -l flag to ignore NFS mounts is hackish, what about smbfs and coda? bin/6183: calling getmntinfo with MNT_NOWAIT can cause stale information to be returned, is this safe/ok? -- -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] "I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message