Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 09:43:17 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> To: Matthew West <mwest@uct.ac.za> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: quota and NFS Message-ID: <20001128094317.H8051@fw.wintelcom.net> In-Reply-To: <20001128153456.A32289@apotheosis.org.za>; from mwest@uct.ac.za on Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 03:34:56PM %2B0200 References: <20001128153456.A32289@apotheosis.org.za>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Matthew West <mwest@uct.ac.za> [001128 05:35] wrote: > Who do I prod to get someone to take a look at bin/12939 and bin/6183? > > I've been using both patches now since FreeBSD 4.0 and they make life > a lot more pleasant when using quota on a machine with NFS mounts. These both look sorta hackish, if you could somehow figure a way to determine if a mount is hung instead of these two fixes it would be a lot better. bin/12939: -l flag to ignore NFS mounts is hackish, what about smbfs and coda? bin/6183: calling getmntinfo with MNT_NOWAIT can cause stale information to be returned, is this safe/ok? -- -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] "I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001128094317.H8051>