Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 16 Sep 1999 11:26:34 +0300
From:      Ruslan Ermilov <ru@ucb.crimea.ua>
To:        elazich@AlaskaAir.com
Cc:        freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   ARP (was: Re: IPFW & NATD)
Message-ID:  <19990916112634.D87554@relay.ucb.crimea.ua>
In-Reply-To: <msg1226967.thr-894a72.4c526e@alaskaair.com>; from elazich@AlaskaAir.com on Wed, Sep 15, 1999 at 10:47:06AM -0700
References:  <msg1219643.thr-894a72.4c526e@alaskaair.com> <19990913210504.D88685@relay.ucb.crimea.ua> <msg1220105.thr-894a72.4c526e@alaskaair.com> <19990913212704.A98610@relay.ucb.crimea.ua> <msg1220314.thr-894a72.4c526e@alaskaair.com> <msg1223309.thr-894a72.4c526e@alaskaair.com> <19990914204140.C19867@relay.ucb.crimea.ua> <msg1226967.thr-894a72.4c526e@alaskaair.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Sep 15, 1999 at 10:47:06AM -0700, elazich@AlaskaAir.com wrote:
> just browsing through my log files and came across this message;
> 
> >Sep 13 14:53:28 capricorn /kernel: arp: 10.0.0.2 is on vx0 but got
> >reply from 00:c0:f0:16:2a:8b on lnc1
> >Sep 13 14:53:29 capricorn /kernel: arp: 10.0.0.2 is on vx0 but got
> >reply from 00:c0:f0:16:2a:8b on lnc1
> >Sep 13 14:59:01 capricorn /kernel: arp: 10.0.0.2 is on vx0 but got
> >reply from 00:c0:f0:16:2a:8b on lnc1
> >Sep 13 14:59:06 capricorn last message repeated 3 times
> 
> the hw address referenced here is not on my internal network and as
> indicated is being resolved by my external NIC.  Why would this be?  I
> thought private addresses were not routed and my routing table appears
> to be correct for my network;
> 
Aha!

Maybe, there is another host on your local ethernet segment that is doing
bridging with your external segment (lnc1), and some host on that external
segment (whose ha==00:c0:f0:16:2a:8b) has an IP address of 10.0.0.2.
This could be easily checked:
(change your local network number)
# ifconfig vx0 inet 10.1.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0
(clear the ARP table)
# arp -a -d
(try to ping 10.0.0.2)
# ping 10.0.0.2

If you'll give a reply from 10.0.0.2, then the above said is true.

<PS>
Anyway, you have a problem with your network configuration, not
with IPFW and NATD.
</PS>

-- 
Ruslan Ermilov		Sysadmin and DBA of the
ru@ucb.crimea.ua	United Commercial Bank,
ru@FreeBSD.org		FreeBSD committer,
+380.652.247.647	Simferopol, Ukraine

http://www.FreeBSD.org	The Power To Serve
http://www.oracle.com	Enabling The Information Age


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990916112634.D87554>