From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 29 18:24:52 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C95516A420 for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 18:24:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (chylonia.3miasto.net [213.192.74.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CB2343D81 for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 18:24:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jATIO1nW078551; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 19:24:01 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id jATINxHh078534; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 19:24:01 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) X-Authentication-Warning: chylonia.3miasto.net: wojtek owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 19:23:58 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar X-X-Sender: wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net To: Ian Lord In-Reply-To: <6.2.3.4.2.20051128141419.02e9ae48@pop.msdi.ca> Message-ID: <20051129192326.H78413@chylonia.3miasto.net> References: <20051128182431.I64067@chylonia.3miasto.net> <6.2.3.4.2.20051128141419.02e9ae48@pop.msdi.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bad instability on FreeBSD/amd64 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 18:24:52 -0000 > > IA32 compat won't help you in this case since these two program are loadable > module so you cannot load a ia32 module in a amd64 compiled application even > with compatIA32 in the kernel. IA32 compatibility matters, but not at kernel level. being able to run linux/i386 binaries will be enough! > > > At 12:26 2005-11-28, Wojciech Puchar wrote: >> i've read few articles on the net that FreeBSD/amd64 crashes very >> frequently, contrary to /i386. >> >> how much truth is in that? i would strongly prefer to run amd64 system on >> amd64 machine that i will buy this week. >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >