From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Nov 19 13: 4:54 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from freesbee.wheel.dk (freesbee.wheel.dk [193.162.159.97]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3EA637B479 for ; Sun, 19 Nov 2000 13:04:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by freesbee.wheel.dk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 872543E4F; Sun, 19 Nov 2000 22:04:51 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2000 22:04:51 +0100 From: Jesper Skriver To: "Louis A. Mamakos" Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: React to ICMP administratively prohibited ? Message-ID: <20001119220451.B41281@skriver.dk> References: <20001118155446.A81075@skriver.dk> <20001118183632.A99512@skriver.dk> <20001119215357.A41281@skriver.dk> <200011192103.eAJL34713541@whizzo.transsys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200011192103.eAJL34713541@whizzo.transsys.com>; from louie@TransSys.COM on Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 04:03:04PM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 04:03:04PM -0500, Louis A. Mamakos wrote: > > This patch seems like it will do the wrong thing for ICMP messages that > are associated with non-TCP packets. It looks like ICMP unreachable > messages for UDP packets will never get delivered to UDP sockets. Yep - I've come to think of this too, I think I'll make it behave like before for non-TCP packets, or do you have a better idea ? /Jesper -- Jesper Skriver, jesper(at)skriver(dot)dk - CCIE #5456 Work: Network manager @ AS3292 (Tele Danmark DataNetworks) Private: Geek @ AS2109 (A much smaller network ;-) One Unix to rule them all, One Resolver to find them, One IP to bring them all and in the zone to bind them. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message