From owner-freebsd-java@freebsd.org Sun Aug 25 20:51:35 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54B90C3549 for ; Sun, 25 Aug 2019 20:51:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46GnP31fJQz4S84 for ; Sun, 25 Aug 2019 20:51:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 3683AC3548; Sun, 25 Aug 2019 20:51:35 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: java@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 363F6C3546 for ; Sun, 25 Aug 2019 20:51:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46GnP30lwbz4S83 for ; Sun, 25 Aug 2019 20:51:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F000C232D9 for ; Sun, 25 Aug 2019 20:51:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x7PKpYDm085132 for ; Sun, 25 Aug 2019 20:51:34 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x7PKpY1d085131 for java@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 25 Aug 2019 20:51:34 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: java@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 239816] java/openjdk11 JRE only option Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2019 20:51:34 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: glewis@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: Works As Intended X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: java@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution bug_status cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2019 20:51:35 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D239816 Greg Lewis changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |Works As Intended Status|New |Closed CC| |glewis@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #2 from Greg Lewis --- As Michael notes, the JRE is no longer being distributed by Oracle for eith= er JDK 11 or 12. Same with AdoptOpenJDK. This stack overflow posting is relevant: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/52714672/is-there-an-openjdk-11-jre Particularly since the author is a Java product manager at Oracle. Basical= ly it sounds like there is no such thing as an official JRE any more. Instead= you can use jlink to create a custom distribution containing only the modules t= hat are needed for your application. However, that's not something you'd want = in the ports system necessarily. So yes, you could do a separate port which limited itself to the set of too= ls that were previously in the JRE, but I'd question the benefits of FreeBSD branching out to do something like this. Absent patches to do just that, I'm going to close this, but please feel fr= ee to create such a port and post some patches for comment. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=