From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Jun 12 16:45:14 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id QAA08503 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 12 Jun 1995 16:45:14 -0700 Received: from physics.su.oz.au (dawes@physics.su.OZ.AU [129.78.129.1]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id QAA08496 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 1995 16:45:08 -0700 Received: by physics.su.oz.au id AA29912 (5.67b/IDA-1.4.4 for hackers@freebsd.org); Tue, 13 Jun 1995 09:44:17 +1000 From: David Dawes Message-Id: <199506122344.AA29912@physics.su.oz.au> Subject: Re: binaries in 2.0.5-RELEASE source dist To: terry@cs.weber.edu (Terry Lambert) Date: Tue, 13 Jun 1995 09:44:16 +1000 (EST) Cc: hackers@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <9506121918.AA21179@cs.weber.edu> from "Terry Lambert" at Jun 12, 95 01:18:53 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 329 Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk >> I've noticed binaries (.o files, etc) in the following places in the >> 2.0.5-RELEASE source dist: >> >> sys/i386/boot/*/ >> lkm/ > > Well, the ones in this dir are *supposed* to be there. They weren't in the 2.0.5-ALPHA source. Are they really in the CVS tree? I thought putting binaries there was not allowed. David