From owner-freebsd-questions Wed May 16 8:23:31 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mta7.pltn13.pbi.net (mta7.pltn13.pbi.net [64.164.98.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DED3837B422; Wed, 16 May 2001 08:23:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rjmcintire@earthlink.net) Received: from emilyd ([64.161.77.242]) by mta7.pltn13.pbi.net (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.3.5.2000.03.23.18.03.p10) with SMTP id <0GDF000NGPEKX5@mta7.pltn13.pbi.net>; Wed, 16 May 2001 08:23:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 08:23:08 -0700 From: "Riley J. McIntire" Subject: RE: Bandwidth Limiting per IP In-reply-to: <200105160636.IAA44066@info.iet.unipi.it> To: Luigi Rizzo , Patrick O'Reilly Cc: ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG, Holtor , questions@FreeBSD.ORG Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Importance: Normal X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Luigi, It looks like you have a typo here. > then everything works pretty fast -- the ruleset is short, and > the pipe processing overhead is O(log n) where n is the number of > _active_ pipes. 0(log n) = 0 is pretty low overhead. n(log n) would seem more appropriate if I had to guess. Riley To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message