From owner-cvs-all  Wed Nov 20 17:11:45 2002
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id AC4F137B401; Wed, 20 Nov 2002 17:11:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tasogare.imasy.or.jp (tasogare.imasy.or.jp [202.227.24.5])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id CA07B43E3B; Wed, 20 Nov 2002 17:11:42 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from iwasaki@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Received: from localhost (iwa@tasogare.imasy.or.jp [202.227.24.5])
	by tasogare.imasy.or.jp (8.11.6+3.4W/8.11.6/tasogare/smtpfeed 1.14) with ESMTP/inet id gAL1BRi00797;
	Thu, 21 Nov 2002 10:11:28 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from iwasaki@jp.FreeBSD.org)
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 10:10:51 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <20021121.101051.131949999.iwasaki@jp.FreeBSD.org>
To: jhb@FreeBSD.org
Cc: sw@anthologeek.net, iwasaki@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org,
	cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, rwatson@FreeBSD.org, bright@mu.org,
	roberto@keltia.freenix.fr
Subject: Re: cvs commit: www/en/releases/5.0R todo.sgml
From: Mitsuru IWASAKI <iwasaki@jp.FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20021120121942.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
References: <20021120160613.GA43304@anthologeek.net>
	<XFMail.20021120121942.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
X-Mailer: Mew version 2.2 on Emacs 20.7 / Mule 4.0 (HANANOEN)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <cvs-all.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20cvs-all>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20cvs-all>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Hi,

> On 20-Nov-2002 Sameh Ghane wrote:
> > Le (On) Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 04:12:22PM +0100, Ollivier Robert ecrivit (wrote):
> >> According to Alfred Perlstein:
> >> > kernel: witness and invariants
> >> > userland: malloc
> >> > 
> >> > any others?
> >> 
> >> Working ACPI ? (although it may be too hard to do fro 5.0-R). Far too many
> >> machines have issues with ACPI :-(
> > 
> > Maybe it's time to import a new snapshot.
> > 
> > I was getting this error:
> > Nov 20 15:14:46 core kernel: acpi0: <GBT    AWRDACPI> on motherboard
> > Nov 20 15:14:46 core kernel: ACPI-0467: *** Error: GPE0 block overlaps the GPE1
> > block
> > Nov 20 15:14:46 core kernel: acpi0: could not enable ACPI: AE_BAD_VALUE
> > Nov 20 15:14:46 core kernel: device_probe_and_attach: acpi0 attach returned 6
> > 
> > and this small patch (from 20021101's snapshot) corrected this behavior:
> > --- evevent.c.old       Wed Nov 20 15:49:34 2002
> > +++ evevent.c   Wed Nov 20 15:53:34 2002
> > @@ -462,9 +462,13 @@
> >      {
> >          /* Check for GPE0/GPE1 overlap */
> >  
> > -        if (AcpiGbl_GpeNumberMax >= AcpiGbl_FADT->Gpe1Base)
> > +        if ((AcpiGbl_GpeBlockInfo[0].RegisterCount) &&
> > +            (AcpiGbl_GpeNumberMax >= AcpiGbl_FADT->Gpe1Base))
> >          {
> > -            ACPI_REPORT_ERROR (("GPE0 block overlaps the GPE1 block\n"));
> > +            ACPI_REPORT_ERROR ((
> > +                "GPE0 block (GPE 0 to %d) overlaps the GPE1 block (GPE %d to
> > %d)\n",
> > +                AcpiGbl_GpeNumberMax, AcpiGbl_FADT->Gpe1Base,
> > +                AcpiGbl_FADT->Gpe1Base + (ACPI_MUL_8
> > (AcpiGbl_GpeBlockInfo[1].RegisterCount) - 1)));
> >              return_ACPI_STATUS (AE_BAD_VALUE);
> >          }
> 
> Yes, if that bug is fixed we should definitely upgrade to a newer import.
> Iwasaki-san, do you think you could do another import prior to RC1?

Yes, if I can.  But I'm having a problem to get acpica-unix-20021118
from Intel site.  I'll ask for Intel people soon...

Thanks

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message