From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 20 04:11:17 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from hub.FreeBSD.org (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:88]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C1EC73D; Fri, 20 Jun 2014 04:11:15 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 00:11:12 -0400 From: Glen Barber To: Warner Losh Subject: Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10 Message-ID: <20140620041112.GS1218@hub.FreeBSD.org> References: <20140617200551.07542580A1@chaos.localdomain> <20140617211436.GI1248@hub.FreeBSD.org> <690CE378-D7D9-49A6-BC20-13FD540E63A2@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="p2u4WfPhYOuYlOsk" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT amd64 X-SCUD-Definition: Sudden Completely Unexpected Dataloss X-SULE-Definition: Sudden Unexpected Learning Event User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: Craig Rodrigues , Brooks Davis , Dimitry Andric , "Simon J. Gerraty" , freebsd-current Current , Marcel Moolenaar X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 04:11:17 -0000 --p2u4WfPhYOuYlOsk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 10:00:03PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: >=20 > On Jun 18, 2014, at 4:32 PM, Craig Rodrigues wrote: >=20 > > On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:59 PM, Dimitry Andric wrot= e: > >>=20 > >> See r257658 which had fixed this, but it was reverted by Warner, > >> unfortunately. This was one of the uses of the EARLY_BUILD flag which > >> was *not* redundant. :-/ > >=20 > >=20 > > Warner, > >=20 > > Is there a way to bring back the behavior of r257658 but without > > the way it was implemented with the EARLY_BUILD flag? > > It would be handy, as we can see by this thread discussion. >=20 > OK. I must be daft, or maybe just missing something. But I can build 9.3 = almost branch point on a current jail running on a 10.x system (to simulate= the 9 on current case). I don=E2=80=99t see the problem being talked about= at all. As for 9 on 10, I was also able to do a build, but my 10.x system = may not have been pristine. >=20 Removal of EARLY_BUILD is not the issue here, I have no idea where the hell the came into play. It is a race in the chain with what make(1) gets built for the stable/9 userland. It is why the 'make make buildworld' thing I mentioned works. Glen --p2u4WfPhYOuYlOsk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJTo7RgAAoJELls3eqvi17QeoUP/2JIqBaHMCPVFtQGXEo3GVkb s3z3R3qadTH+hucDyMTg21iZNFW5b5YaIJfoNvHcmaVQ6HK/TTV8U/Fob9TyPMpe q5ZMqq6hQUrPMHkXUJD3YEQojQucxDKL2qojjlII2ZW5hAaDvOaq/yLQlELiM8JY yMQ778V94qzFmWdeYhV8uKLJBtaCDm9aJKufbg2SkHevayMTBq6VCde/blY7Gh4I wOFy6Z5yhjdPD4jY+I9ErMkCBMiBE+64/wsDPZseQ12Zq+nxriDDjLS9hkVPt6lt LxlaMSO0AuisT1My0RtrkhMmFGYiMNEp99un8XVvKYkbQHqtT8stG9nCRa8qTeNi xCRkOhxpb8GMinjU0/GWzQurN/pl2KjdGSCUFdo2tet0wu2sqBkDgDzmteAGT3P+ HOCyUsZyvd61Y9RV6zt9kfVdVweJbFFCKlF6/jesN5pN0vXK6vLFU37meLAM6Hx0 k74DIS2197Ud3ToBPQDYl0Q2t0maLZWB/AizWbo/IDg914ChIew+D1qzuXOMXf49 MI/5Z88xv2by7d1ynp5Fa4dB0L+QQG0sFeu5wpa04z/RTnPwKryEMI4Q7OiS2wZ3 8Eojp1X/isf/xEUbnWVPFEM55+4eeRUJexInfvplpokoajHFf3BAtcxENPvTf5iD oI1i+mn1GB5JbUFMg5x5 =8nBJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --p2u4WfPhYOuYlOsk--