From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Apr 9 20:53:40 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from gladstone.uoregon.edu (gladstone.uoregon.edu [128.223.142.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8EB937B400 for ; Tue, 9 Apr 2002 20:53:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from d184-101.uoregon.edu (anholt@d184-101.uoregon.edu [128.223.184.101]) by gladstone.uoregon.edu (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g3A3rXYx014344; Tue, 9 Apr 2002 20:53:33 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: drm-kmod + XFree86 From: Eric Anholt To: Paul Murphy Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <20020409175524.30362815.pnmurphy@cogeco.ca> References: <20020408200532.18e2f2aa.pnmurphy@cogeco.ca> <1018383557.339.41.camel@anholt.dyndns.org> <20020409175524.30362815.pnmurphy@cogeco.ca> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.3 Date: 09 Apr 2002 21:53:34 -0600 Message-Id: <1018410814.317.39.camel@anholt.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > > without it you don't? That wasn't what I understood from your last > > message to me. If so, then that is an issue, and it's one I hadn't seen > > yet. However, something seems strange because you had a previous > > message to me about the drm causing Netscape to crash, which is > > Y.A.C. (yet another coincidence), never really used Netscape that much to follow up on it, and have since switched to Mozilla (with no problems). > > > something that again I hadn't seen or heard from anyone else about. Is > > there anything special about your system, any extra CFLAGS, any modified > > things in XFree86/drm-kmod makefiles, etc? > > > > drm-kmod Makefile is virgin. I _did_ apply the patch at PR ports/36121 (which didn't go smoothly and required some hand editing ['BuildXF86DRM=NO \' did not get added, it seems the context has changed]) You shouldn't need any patches to X at this point for DRI compiling. You probably don't want to use the modules that come with X because the drm-kmod ones should work better. I would normally say "check out CVS and see if that changes anything", but I don't think anything has changed for the r128 in CVS. > > make.conf is: > > CPUTYPE=k7 > #CPUTYPE=i586 # ignore - for remote buildworlds > CFLAGS= -O -pipe > #CXXFLAGS= -fmemoize-lookups -fsave-memoized > COPTFLAGS= -O -pipe > XFREE86_VERSION= 4 > WITHOUT_GNOME=yes > Doh! (Every time I see questions regarding XFree the reply is 'let's see your XFree86.0.log output') Yeah, usually an XFree86.0.log is good for X questions, but as -questions is a very general list it's probably a good idea to put it somewhere else if possible. > > Should I reinstall XFree with an unadulterated Makefile? Should I let it compile it's own DRM modules? If so would reinstalling XFree86-4-Server and XFree86-4-libraries be sufficient? I don't know what you should do at this point. If you were to compile, XFree86-4-Server is all you need to do because it is the only one that does DRI and 2d driver stuff. The only possible change I would make would be dropping the CPUTYPE because I'm wary of extra optimizations in gcc (and considering that you seem to be the only one so far seeing this). > > -- > Cogeco ergo sum To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message