From owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jun 22 20:13:44 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A210C16A41C
	for <freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 22 Jun 2005 20:13:44 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from vadim_nuclight@mail.ru)
Received: from mx6.mail.ru (mx6.mail.ru [194.67.23.26])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E52643D4C
	for <freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 22 Jun 2005 20:13:44 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from vadim_nuclight@mail.ru)
Received: from [83.172.3.194] (port=54503 helo=[83.172.3.194])
	by mx6.mail.ru with esmtp id 1DlBbS-0008AB-00
	for freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org; Thu, 23 Jun 2005 00:13:43 +0400
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 03:11:10 +0700
From: Vadim Goncharov <vadim_nuclight@mail.ru>
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v2.10.01) Personal
Organization: Home
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <1148288725.20050623031110@mail.ru>
To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <4E4F19D4-F10F-4F15-AF9D-B1FCCEB6FFF9@glbx.net>
References: <6F2F8FD3FBCF7A489CB18912A4807EBA0E0851@mvwcim1a.acuson.com>
	<42B76191.1040402@buckhorn.net>
	<4E4F19D4-F10F-4F15-AF9D-B1FCCEB6FFF9@glbx.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re[2]: FreeBSD entry on Wikipedia
X-BeenThere: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Vadim Goncharov <vadim_nuclight@mail.ru>
List-Id: FreeBSD Evangelism <freebsd-advocacy.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-advocacy-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-advocacy>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-advocacy-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-advocacy-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 20:13:44 -0000

Hello Andy,

Thursday, June 23, 2005, 3:03:20 AM, you wrote:

AG> On 21 Jun 2005, at 01:38, Bob Martin wrote:
>> IMHO, if they can roll out a patch to a major security flaw in a  
>> day, they should have been able to fix the uptime clock at some  
>> point in the last decade. Odd that MS can do something that Linux  
>> can't.
AG> This was fixed about 3 years ago.

Sure? So why Netcraft states about it aven nowadays? Even more, it says
that some versions of FreeBSD (newer, as I understood) also wrap that
uptime counter?

-- 
Best regards,
 Vadim Goncharov   ICQ UIN 166852181   mailto:vadim_nuclight@mail.ru