Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2000 15:51:32 +0200 From: Peter Pentchev <roam@orbitel.bg> To: andrew@ugh.net.au Cc: Max Khon <fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru>, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: daemon() Message-ID: <20001107155132.A4407@ringworld.oblivion.bg> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0011072340331.80082-100000@starbug.ugh.net.au>; from andrew@ugh.net.au on Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 11:41:19PM %2B1000 References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0011071837210.27603-100000@iclub.nsu.ru> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0011072340331.80082-100000@starbug.ugh.net.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 11:41:19PM +1000, andrew@ugh.net.au wrote: > > > On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, Max Khon wrote: > > > what is FD 4? > > I can't reproduce this? Does it always happen? <AOL> Me neither.. </AOL> RELENG_4 here, but daemon() seems to be exactly the same across (supported) releases. All fd's I can see on a fstat -p are 0, 1 and 2. G'luck, Peter -- If there were no counterfactuals, this sentence would not have been paradoxical. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001107155132.A4407>