From owner-freebsd-isp Thu May 15 13:32:24 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA13078 for isp-outgoing; Thu, 15 May 1997 13:32:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from user.xtdl.com (user.xtdl.com [206.25.228.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id NAA13067; Thu, 15 May 1997 13:32:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from sderdau@localhost) by user.xtdl.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id QAA07276; Thu, 15 May 1997 16:43:23 -0400 Date: Thu, 15 May 1997 16:43:23 -0400 (EDT) From: "Stephen A. Derdau" To: The Devil Himself cc: Pat McPartland , freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG, FBSD questions Subject: Re: 2.1.5 or 2.2.1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-isp@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Great We have 2.2.1. I'll have to check the version of appache though! Stephen A. Derdau XTDL inc 603 4714700 "It's just a matter of perspective" On Thu, 15 May 1997, The Devil Himself wrote: > On Thu, 15 May 1997, Stephen A. Derdau wrote: > > > Yes please let me know also....WE also are an ISP and are meeting > > tonight to discuss an upgrade. Which version of FreeBSD do you need > > to run front page extensions is all that I would add. > > > > Thank You > > > > > > Stephen A. Derdau > > XTDL inc > > 603 4714700 "It's just a matter of perspective" > The company I work for is running 2.1-STABLE systems, and we have > frontpage extensions on. I don't think it matters what verison of > FreeeBSD you're using acvtually; just what version of the web server > (Apache, in our case) you are running. > > > > > > > On Thu, 15 May 1997, Pat McPartland wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > I am an ISP. I have to upgrade my webserver. Should I upgrade to 2.1.5 or > > > 2.2.1? I have the CDs, but I'm not sure which would be better. I was > > > thinking of upgrading to 2.2.1 since I have it, but I read a message in the > > > archives discouraging 2.2.1? Any advice? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Pat > > > > > > Patrick McPartland > > > mcp@blast.net > > Go with 2.2.1. > There have been some problems with 2.2, which is why 2.2.1 came out, but > anything before 2.1.6 had a fair-sized security hole, plus there are a lot > of features in 2.2.1 that would be nice on a system that's going to take > some load. > > Hope it helps!! > > *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* > |FreeBSD is good. FreeBSD is our friend. UNIX is our god.| > *Micro$oft is bad. Micro$oft causes problems.* > |MicroBSD??? I DON'T THINK SO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!| > |"I hate quotes in signature files" :-} MAtthew Fuller| > *fullermd@narcissus.ml.org FreeBSD junkie* > |http://keystone.westminster.edu/~fullermd Westminster College| > *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* > > >