Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 09:21:43 +0200 From: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: Oliver Eikemeier <eik@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: ports/66032: [PATCH] bsd.port.mk: clean room installation Message-ID: <40AB0B07.2080704@fillmore-labs.com> In-Reply-To: <20040519034726.GA58848@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200404271702.i3RH2ghY025703@freefall.freebsd.org> <20040519034726.GA58848@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 10:02:42AM -0700, Oliver Eikemeier wrote: > >>Synopsis: [PATCH] bsd.port.mk: clean room installation >> >>Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->portmgr >>Responsible-Changed-By: eik >>Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Apr 27 19:02:10 CEST 2004 >>Responsible-Changed-Why: >>Over to our beloved port managers >> >>http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=66032 > > OpenBSD does this - how does their implementation differ (variable > names, method, etc)? What do you want to know? OpenBSD calls it `fake' installation, has some more knobs to customize the process (like renaming DESTDIR): .if !defined(FAKE_FLAGS) FAKE_FLAGS=${DESTDIRNAME}=${WRKINST} .endif IMHO we can add these when need arises. Otherwise it seems FAKE is the default in OpenBSD, so a port has to set FAKE=no if it doesn't want to do this. Is compatibility with OpenBSD an issue? -Oliver
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?40AB0B07.2080704>