From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Jun 23 8:53:43 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from gw.nectar.com (gw.nectar.com [209.98.143.44]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DE7D37B92E; Fri, 23 Jun 2000 08:53:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nectar@nectar.com) Received: from bone.nectar.com (bone.nectar.com [10.0.1.105]) by gw.nectar.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF3929B37; Fri, 23 Jun 2000 10:53:34 -0500 (CDT) Received: by bone.nectar.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 177DD1DC6; Fri, 23 Jun 2000 10:53:33 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2000 10:53:32 -0500 From: "Jacques A . Vidrine" To: Will Andrews Cc: Gerald Pfeifer , Maxim Sobolev , ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports-maintainers? Message-ID: <20000623105332.J76049@bone.nectar.com> References: <394CA25D.77A15740@FreeBSD.org> <20000623075752.B77304@argon.gryphonsoft.com> <20000623080331.D77304@argon.gryphonsoft.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <20000623080331.D77304@argon.gryphonsoft.com>; from andrews@TECHNOLOGIST.COM on Fri, Jun 23, 2000 at 08:03:31AM -0400 X-Url: http://www.nectar.com/ Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, Jun 23, 2000 at 08:03:31AM -0400, Will Andrews wrote: > I just had an idea.. what if this list could also include commit > messages relating only to ports? > > Kinda like cvs-all but only for ports? No thanks ... a low-volume list should certainly not get commit messages. Not to mention the penalty of receiving every port commit message twice, if you want to watch cvs-all too. That isn't to say that there might be some merit to a port commits only list-- just don't tie it to some other list as well. -- Jacques Vidrine / n@nectar.com / nectar@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message