From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Thu May 26 19:34:30 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A2D0B4B0C7 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 19:34:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A4F114AF for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 19:34:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u4QJYTKu084477 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 19:34:30 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 208577] security/sslscan: Upgrade to 1.11.5 Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 19:34:30 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: 1983-01-06@gmx.net X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 19:34:30 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D208577 --- Comment #7 from Michael Osipov <1983-01-06@gmx.net> --- (In reply to Gavin Atkinson from comment #6) I will retry your patch shortly on 9.3-RELEASE and 10.3-RELEASE and let you know. Note that if you have OpenSSL in place, you should leave the option wether = from base or ports. Accordingly CFLAGS and LDFLAGS need to be changed. Some of t= here I have fixed and reported already: https://github.com/rbsec/sslscan/pull/91 https://github.com/rbsec/sslscan/pull/90 --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=