From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Mar 11 19:31:58 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDFB416A4CE
	for <fs@freebsd.org>; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 19:31:58 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from ebb.errno.com (ebb.errno.com [66.127.85.87])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A10ED43D3F
	for <fs@freebsd.org>; Fri, 11 Mar 2005 19:31:58 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from sam@errno.com)
Received: from [66.127.85.91] (sam@[66.127.85.91])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by ebb.errno.com (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id j2BJVums073365
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Fri, 11 Mar 2005 11:31:57 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from sam@errno.com)
Message-ID: <4231F290.2060308@errno.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 11:33:36 -0800
From: Sam Leffler <sam@errno.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0RC1 (X11/20041208)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ian Dowse <iedowse@maths.tcd.ie>
References: <200503111910.aa12186@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <200503111910.aa12186@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: fs@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: dirhash potential bug
X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Filesystems <freebsd-fs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 19:31:59 -0000

Ian Dowse wrote:
> In message <4231D417.9060705@errno.com>, Sam Leffler writes:
> 
>>Coverity's analysis tool claims there might be a null bp dereferenced in
>>ufsdirhash_lookup.  Attached is a patch to add a KASSERT but it'd be
>>good for someone more familiar with the code to check if a change is
>>required.
> 
> 
> Sam, maybe you missed my reply to your original message about this?
> Here it is again anyway.

Never saw it; thanks for re-sending.

	Sam