From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 7 10:46:25 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB0CA16A417 for ; Wed, 7 Nov 2007 10:46:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-current@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A682F13C4BF for ; Wed, 7 Nov 2007 10:46:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-current@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IpiQB-0006N3-KU for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Wed, 07 Nov 2007 10:46:07 +0000 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 07 Nov 2007 10:46:07 +0000 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 07 Nov 2007 10:46:07 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2007 11:48:50 +0100 Lines: 11 Message-ID: References: <20071106131741.grldkfpy80s4sw0w@newwebmail.jnielsen.net> <196381.86340.qm@web30305.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070801) In-Reply-To: <196381.86340.qm@web30305.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Sender: news Subject: Re: geom_raid5 inclusion in HEAD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2007 10:46:26 -0000 Arne Wörner wrote: > Not recently... And: "No"... > IIRC they believed, that it is too much code and too complex code... Maybe that > was the polite form of "chaotic/un-maintain-able code"... :-)) I don't remember entire discussions about geom_raid5 but I seem to recall there was concern about its aggressive caching, possibly in the write path, which could make recovery in case of e.g. power outage problematic. I'm possibly mis-remembering this so feel free to ignore if it's not relevant to your geom_raid5.