Date: Sun, 27 Aug 1995 23:42:36 -0700 From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) To: jfieber@grendel.csc.smith.edu Cc: ache@astral.msk.su, jkh@time.cdrom.com, CVS-commiters@freefall.FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@freefall.FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/utils/astrolog Makefile Message-ID: <199508280642.XAA01494@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> In-Reply-To: <199508261540.KAA04126@fieber-john.campusview.indiana.edu> (message from John Fieber on Sat, 26 Aug 1995 10:40:25 -0500 (EST))
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* From: John Fieber <jfieber@grendel.csc.smith.edu> * This is getting absurd. Why not put it in applications category * to keep oleo company. It *is* an application. Let the user * decide whether it is a game, art, research, occult or whatever. John, I believe you are looking at the "ports page" on the www site. If so, that's not what we are talking about -- we are discussing which subdirectory of /usr/ports this will go (although that usually mirrors the "category" on the ports page). There is an "applications" category, but I was just about to move oleo out of it and create a new category "spreadsheets" for it. "applications" and "utilities" are just too vague and will cover almost everything or nothing, depending on your definition (do you believe that there is only one "application" out of the 300+ ports?).... Satoshi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199508280642.XAA01494>