From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 25 15:01:34 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5652F16A41C for ; Wed, 25 May 2005 15:01:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from steve@lonres.com) Received: from anchor-post-32.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-32.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F38A943D1D for ; Wed, 25 May 2005 15:01:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from steve@lonres.com) Received: from mail.lonres.com ([194.70.153.187]) by anchor-post-32.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1DaxNy-000MAz-9F for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 25 May 2005 15:01:31 +0000 Received: from bibipentium.lonres.com (bibipentium.lonres.com [10.10.10.225]) by mail.lonres.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C6DF52E07C for ; Wed, 25 May 2005 16:01:30 +0100 (BST) Received: by bibipentium.lonres.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 25 May 2005 16:01:54 +0100 From: "Steve Roome" Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 16:01:54 +0100 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050525150154.GA11780@bibipentium.lonres.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="azLHFNyN32YCQGCU" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: snapshot mtime updated X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 15:01:34 -0000 --azLHFNyN32YCQGCU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hi all, I've got a problem where I'm taking a snapshot of a filesystem, mdcofigging (readonly) and then mounting it ro,noatime. Somehow the mtime on the snapshot file is being updated whenever I read from the newly mounted md device (pointing at the snapshot). This doesn't seem right, and I've included the script I'm using to do this. I'm not really interested in ways to fix this script, though there are probably many better ways to do this, right now I'm just unsure if this is the correct behavious for snapshots. Thanks in advance if anyone knows what's going on here, Steve Roome P.S. I'm not subscribed to the mailing list, please cc responses to me. --azLHFNyN32YCQGCU--