From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 6 19:27:25 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA27838 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Mon, 6 Jul 1998 19:27:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mail.wsg.net (ns1.wsg.net [206.97.122.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id TAA27817 for ; Mon, 6 Jul 1998 19:27:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gilem@wsg.net) Received: (qmail 17494 invoked by uid 0); 7 Jul 1998 02:33:18 -0000 Received: from mike.wsg.net (HELO tc) (206.97.122.31) by mail.wsg.net with SMTP; 7 Jul 1998 02:33:18 -0000 Message-Id: <4.0.1.19980706222225.01022100@mail.wsg.net> X-Sender: mikemail@mail.wsg.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.0.1 Date: Mon, 06 Jul 1998 22:25:15 -0400 To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG From: "Michael R. Gile" Subject: freebsd 3.0 stability In-Reply-To: <199807062113.WAA01507@indigo.ie> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG is anyone on this list running both 3.0-current and 2.2-stable, that could perhaps give me a comparison? i am interested primarily in the SMP capabilities, to use with other freebsd machines, rather than running Linux, but would like some opinions on the stability of 3.0, given the fact that 3.0-release probably wont be seen for some time. thanks. ====================================================== Michael Gile gilem@wsg.net President (518)435-0682 Web Services Group http://www.wsg.net/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message