From owner-freebsd-net Fri Sep 8 12:18:35 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from gw.nectar.com (gw.nectar.com [208.42.49.153]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C346D37B424 for ; Fri, 8 Sep 2000 12:18:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by gw.nectar.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 564BB1925A; Fri, 8 Sep 2000 14:18:31 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2000 14:18:31 -0500 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: aironet help Message-ID: <20000908141831.A1202@spawn.nectar.com> Mail-Followup-To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" , freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i X-Url: http://www.nectar.com/ Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi all, I just got a Cisco Aironet PC Card and a PCI card, and slapped'em into a couple of machines here running 4.1-STABLE, ifconfig'd them, and tried to get'em talking. However, I'm having trouble on one of the machines (the one with the PCI card): I can't use the interface to send packets (no route to host). Machine spawn: an0: port 0xef00-0xef3f,0xec00-0xec7f mem 0xfebfdf80-0xfebfdfff irq 9 at device 20.0 on pci0 an0: Ethernet address: 00:40:96:33:a3:e7 an0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 inet6 fe80::240:96ff:fe33:a3e7%an0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3 inet 10.0.2.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.0.2.255 inet6 fec0:2::240:96ff:fe33:a3e7 prefixlen 64 ether 00:40:96:33:a3:e7 Machine ophelia: an0: at port 0x240-0x27f irq 3 slot 0 on pccard0 an0: Ethernet address: 00:40:96:31:e6:3c an0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 inet 10.0.2.2 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.0.2.255 inet6 fe80::240:96ff:fe31:e63c%an0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x4 ether 00:40:96:31:e6:3c Now for some reason, I get `No route to host' on machine spawn: spawn% ping -c 1 -q 10.0.2.1 # ping myself PING 10.0.2.1 (10.0.2.1): 56 data bytes --- 10.0.2.1 ping statistics --- 1 packets transmitted, 1 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.127/0.127/0.127/0.000 ms spawn% ping -c 1 -q 10.0.2.2 # ping ophelia PING 10.0.2.2 (10.0.2.2): 56 data bytes ping: sendto: No route to host ^C spawn% ping -c 1 -q 10.0.2.255 # ping broadcast? PING 10.0.2.255 (10.0.2.255): 56 data bytes ping: sendto: No route to host ^C Oddly enough, on machine ophelia I have no such trouble: ophelia% ping -c 3 -q 10.0.2.1 # ping spawn PING 10.0.2.1 (10.0.2.1): 56 data bytes --- 10.0.2.1 ping statistics --- 3 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss And I can even see the packets coming in on machine spawn! spawn% tcpdump -n -i an0 tcpdump: listening on an0 14:12:27.479190 10.0.2.2 > 10.0.2.1: icmp: echo request 14:12:28.483487 10.0.2.2 > 10.0.2.1: icmp: echo request 14:12:29.493505 10.0.2.2 > 10.0.2.1: icmp: echo request What could have gone wrong? The routing table looks right to me: spawn% netstat -rn | grep ^10.0.2 10.0.2/24 link#3 UC 0 0 an0 => 10.0.2.1 0:40:96:33:a3:e7 UHLW 0 10 lo0 10.0.2.2 link#3 UHLW 0 1 an0 => 10.0.2.255 ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff UHLWb 0 5 an0 Manually adding to the arp table doesn't change the symptoms. Does someone have a clue I could borrow? :-) -- Jacques Vidrine / n@nectar.com / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message