From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 26 00:07:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 709A316A4CE; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 00:07:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sage.thought.org (dsl231-043-140.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.231.43.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4A9143D31; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 00:07:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: from thought.org (tao [10.0.0.247]) by sage.thought.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i7Q07IoK026716; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 17:07:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: from tao.thought.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thought.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i7Q07Gnb089350; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 17:07:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: (from kline@localhost) by tao.thought.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i7Q07Gru089349; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 17:07:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline) Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 17:07:15 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: Chris Message-ID: <20040826000715.GD89034@thought.org> References: <412D10E7.8020704@makeworld.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <412D10E7.8020704@makeworld.com> X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: Observing 18 years of service to the Unix community User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: FreeBSD - Current cc: FreeBSD - Questions Subject: Re: 5.3-Beta1: So far, so goo. Day 5. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 00:07:21 -0000 Hi Chris, and howdy rest-of-list, On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 05:21:27PM -0500, Chris wrote: > Well - this is my 5th day using 5.3-Beta1 (sup'ing from 5.2.1-p9) > I removed the debuging code in the kernel - runs well for a Beta. Brave man... . I think I'll wait awhile before upgrading to RELENG_5. But Q1: how exactly, does one get rid of the debugging stuff? And Q2, now that we've got gcc-3.4, would it help to use a higher opyimization? say, "-O3"? .... > > Since I use KDE, I did notice that Kgpg (whatever it is) is non > functional. S'ok tho - I dont use Kmail so to me that's not an issue. > > Everything from an day-to-day basis runs. Nothing seems to have been > broken that I found. > > This is my production PC at home, so it's being used constantly. > > I'm unsure where to post this, so I sent to Questions and Current. > I've got two 400MHz platforms, so I want to be able to max'z the systems. System tuningg obviously helps, and hopefully the new compiler will help too. cheers, gary -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org www.thought.org Public service Unix