From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Mar 19 13:28:39 2008
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033)
	id 81B921065677; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 13:28:39 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 13:28:39 +0000
From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
To: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <20080319132839.GC90943@FreeBSD.org>
References: <200803180100.m2I10QTD070047@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<20080318193855.0439b197.stas@FreeBSD.org>
	<20080318181546.GA10903@FreeBSD.org>
	<1205917353.76695.0.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz>
	<20080319091859.GA56200@FreeBSD.org>
	<1205921932.76695.14.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz>
	<20080319112314.GA76554@FreeBSD.org>
	<1205929480.76695.36.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz>
	<20080319153714.df825001.stas@FreeBSD.org>
	<1205930539.76695.51.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1205930539.76695.51.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Cc: Stanislav Sedov <stas@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org,
	ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org,
	Pietro Cerutti <gahr@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/java/eclipseme Makefile distinfo pkg-plist
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 13:28:39 -0000

On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 01:42:19PM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> 
> Sorry, but I don't consider the muting of mkdir commands as something
> that can lead to insecure or simply broken-by-design port. Thus it's not
> worth a policy.

Agreed, it's not that important.  When I said it should be a policy I
merely thought that in this case, there'd be nothing to hesitate about.
It does not make me mad when I see unmuted MKDIR, yet I'd love to see
more consistency here.  No more, no less.

> 
> Or you're talking about some other common issue now?

I think I managed to bring up common issue in that rather lengthy email
of mine.  :-)

./danfe