From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Feb 18 08:52:09 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 394551065674;
	Sat, 18 Feb 2012 08:52:09 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
Received: from phk.freebsd.dk (phk.freebsd.dk [130.225.244.222])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C15A28FC08;
	Sat, 18 Feb 2012 08:52:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [192.168.61.3])
	by phk.freebsd.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AF575DA8;
	Sat, 18 Feb 2012 08:34:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by critter.freebsd.dk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q1I8Y5jT020792;
	Sat, 18 Feb 2012 08:34:05 GMT (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
To: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org>
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 17 Feb 2012 23:46:56 PST."
	<20120218074655.GF31998@elvis.mu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 08:34:05 +0000
Message-ID: <20791.1329554045@critter.freebsd.dk>
Cc: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, arch@freebsd.org,
	current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Last call: removing the INT_MAX limit on max i/o size
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 08:52:09 -0000

In message <20120218074655.GF31998@elvis.mu.org>, Alfred Perlstein writes:

>I always wonder if it's worth defining a type for this, resid_t or
>something,

Wouldn't that naturally be size_t ?

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.