From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 25 11:26:40 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 527D9810; Fri, 25 Oct 2013 11:26:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=101050af22=killing@multiplay.co.uk) Received: from mail1.multiplay.co.uk (mail1.multiplay.co.uk [85.236.96.23]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70A952F10; Fri, 25 Oct 2013 11:26:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r2d2 ([82.69.141.170]) by mail1.multiplay.co.uk (mail1.multiplay.co.uk [85.236.96.23]) (MDaemon PRO v10.0.4) with ESMTP id md50006501842.msg; Fri, 25 Oct 2013 12:26:22 +0100 X-Spam-Processed: mail1.multiplay.co.uk, Fri, 25 Oct 2013 12:26:22 +0100 (not processed: message from valid local sender) X-MDDKIM-Result: neutral (mail1.multiplay.co.uk) X-MDRemoteIP: 82.69.141.170 X-Return-Path: prvs=101050af22=killing@multiplay.co.uk X-Envelope-From: killing@multiplay.co.uk Message-ID: From: "Steven Hartland" To: "David Chisnall" References: <201310250909.r9P990nk083926@svn.freebsd.org> <2DE0EA95F6944DB28D4B2F03EEF582F8@multiplay.co.uk> <7DCDC9F2-776B-41AC-B34F-8A5144A4AF0D@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r257109 - head/contrib/llvm/tools/clang/tools/driver Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 12:26:21 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="Windows-1252"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, Dimitry Andric , src-committers@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 11:26:40 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Chisnall" On 25 Oct 2013, at 06:03, "Steven Hartland" wrote: > > As discussed on IRC while I agree removing CC is possibly the better > > fix moving forward, I think removing /usr/bin/CC has quite a bit more > > risk, especially at this stage in the release phase of 10. > > I'm not sure what the risk is. CC is an IRIXism that was never part of any > standard. Linux distros don't seem to provide a CC, just a c++, so this is > unlikely to cause problems with ported code. > > We've discussed removing CC for a while, and I think it's the right call. We shouldn't forget that removing the creation of the link is not enough to "remove" CC, it would also need to be added to the delete-old target and also needs the user to run delete-old, which is a step not everyone does ;-) Given this even if we do remove CC I think its still prudent to keep the fix for CC in clang as well. Regards Steve ================================================ This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in it. In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please telephone +44 845 868 1337 or return the E.mail to postmaster@multiplay.co.uk.