From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Feb 25 09:08:36 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBCB816A401
	for <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 25 Feb 2007 09:08:36 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gofp-freebsd-performance@m.gmane.org)
Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 993CB13C48D
	for <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 25 Feb 2007 09:08:32 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gofp-freebsd-performance@m.gmane.org)
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HLFMl-0001or-41
	for freebsd-performance@freebsd.org; Sun, 25 Feb 2007 10:08:23 +0100
Received: from 194.204.57.56 ([194.204.57.56])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>; Sun, 25 Feb 2007 10:08:23 +0100
Received: from ivoras by 194.204.57.56 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>; Sun, 25 Feb 2007 10:08:23 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr>
Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 11:08:20 +0100
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <errjlr$a8p$1@sea.gmane.org>
References: <20070224215508.GA41968@xor.obsecurity.org>	<45E13410.7020505@he.iki.fi>	<20070225071946.GA48242@xor.obsecurity.org>	<45E14BAD.80909@he.iki.fi>
	<20070225084737.GA49231@xor.obsecurity.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 194.204.57.56
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Windows/20061207)
In-Reply-To: <20070225084737.GA49231@xor.obsecurity.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.0
Sender: news <news@sea.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: Progress on scaling of FreeBSD on 8 CPU systems
X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance/tuning <freebsd-performance.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance>,
	<mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-performance>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance>,
	<mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 09:08:36 -0000

Kris Kennaway wrote:

>>>> How does that compare to 6.2-RELEASE performance?
>>>>    
>>> Much better.  Fixing filedesc locking was key.
>>>
>>>  
>> If there is extra cycles on the same hardware, a performance comparison 
>> graph would be great.
> 
> See the links in my posting ;)

I think he means graphs between 6-stable and 7-current - it would be
very nice to see those on the same machine, mysql configuration, etc.
(at the very least to clearly show why people should upgrade :) ).