From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 29 15:40:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 908A41065677 for ; Sat, 29 May 2010 15:40:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 677688FC1C for ; Sat, 29 May 2010 15:40:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o4TFe7A0012322 for ; Sat, 29 May 2010 15:40:07 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o4TFe6Qn012321; Sat, 29 May 2010 15:40:06 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Resent-Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 15:40:06 GMT Resent-Message-Id: <201005291540.o4TFe6Qn012321@freefall.freebsd.org> Resent-From: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org (GNATS Filer) Resent-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Resent-Reply-To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, Jose M Rodriguez Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67A181065678 for ; Sat, 29 May 2010 15:38:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es) Received: from IMPaqm1.telefonica.net (impaqm1.telefonica.net [213.4.138.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F13118FC14 for ; Sat, 29 May 2010 15:38:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from IMPmailhost6.adm.correo ([10.20.102.127]) by IMPaqm1.telefonica.net with bizsmtp id PQ0r1e01L2kvMAa01TR6Zu; Sat, 29 May 2010 17:25:06 +0200 Received: from mag.animas.redesjm.priv ([81.34.118.134]) by IMPmailhost6.adm.correo with BIZ IMP id PTQy1e00m2u3vpd1mTR3Z5; Sat, 29 May 2010 17:25:06 +0200 Received: from animas.redesjm.priv (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mag.animas.redesjm.priv (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o4TFOsYk002650 for ; Sat, 29 May 2010 17:24:54 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from josemi@animas.redesjm.priv) Received: (from josemi@localhost) by animas.redesjm.priv (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o4TFOsFB002649; Sat, 29 May 2010 17:24:54 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from josemi) Message-Id: <201005291524.o4TFOsFB002649@animas.redesjm.priv> Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 17:24:54 +0200 (CEST) From: Jose M Rodriguez To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.113 Cc: Subject: kern/147191: Problems with ppp -nat [pppoe], ipfw, dummynet X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Jose M Rodriguez List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 May 2010 15:40:07 -0000 >Number: 147191 >Category: kern >Synopsis: Problems with ppp -nat [pppoe], ipfw, dummynet >Confidential: no >Severity: serious >Priority: low >Responsible: freebsd-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Sat May 29 15:40:06 UTC 2010 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Jose M Rodriguez >Release: FreeBSD 8.1-PRERELEASE amd64 >Organization: Redes JM >Environment: System: FreeBSD mag.animas.redesjm.priv 8.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.1-PRERELEASE #0: Thu May 27 06:34:54 UTC 2010 root@mag.animas.redesjm.priv:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 >Description: Machine running as internet gateway (ipv4 only) just one inet interface nfe0 used both for internal lan and pppoe connection to adsl bridge ppp used for pppoe, again over nfe0, with nat enable ipfw used with dummynet for firewalling and traffic sharper I can send requested config on demand - I have Internet conectivity - pppoe seems working, nat included, even opened ports - internal lan seems ok, both in and out - traffic received via tun0 seems working - In lan workstations have correct inet access - In lan p2p working ok (bitcomet) - transmission-bt working ok on server But, traffic sharp doesnt work as spected After all short of test, seems that: - traffic from local lan to tun0 pass out without hit on fw rules - after log enable, I can see ONLY local traffic xmit tun0 tested with/without tx/rx checksuming aids an tso, no luck any clues are wellcome >How-To-Repeat: All sort of test done in fw rules, without any hit detected, so I suspect traffic from lan is going directly to tun0 without hitting dummynet. >Fix: Well, this is not the case >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: