Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 24 Aug 2020 07:42:41 -0600
From:      Gary Aitken <freebsd@dreamchaser.org>
To:        Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>, FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Suggestion regarding fsck output enhancement
Message-ID:  <8e27f7a6-f7db-dec3-0705-e64c4e2cfdb3@dreamchaser.org>
In-Reply-To: <20200824104017.4c241ec0.freebsd@edvax.de>
References:  <20200824104017.4c241ec0.freebsd@edvax.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 8/24/20 2:40 AM, Polytropon wrote:
> Today I came across a situation where I would think fsck should
> output a little more information, which would be helpful especially
> in diagnostics and dry-run sessions prior to recovery.
> 
> Example:
> 
> 	INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=24236 (288 should be 268)
> 	CORRECT? yes
> 
> Or:
> 
> 	UNREF FILE  I=63518082  OWNER=test1 MODE=100644
> 	SIZE=0 MTIME=Aug 24 09:45 2020
> 	RECONNECT? yes
> 
> In both entries, the inode number is mentioned. Wouldn't it be
> nice to display a file or directory name, if possible, to show
> what file could be affected? 

+10!




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8e27f7a6-f7db-dec3-0705-e64c4e2cfdb3>