From owner-freebsd-arch Thu Feb 15 3: 8:20 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65E0537B491 for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 03:08:15 -0800 (PST) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA04457; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 12:08:14 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Proposal on shared libs version values. References: <200102140444.f1E4iLU70786@mobile.wemm.org> <20010215013414.C66813@dragon.nuxi.com> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 15 Feb 2001 12:08:13 +0100 In-Reply-To: "David O'Brien"'s message of "Thu, 15 Feb 2001 01:34:14 -0800" Message-ID: Lines: 11 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0802 (Gnus v5.8.2) Emacs/20.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "David O'Brien" writes: > On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 12:45:30PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > Right, so why are we getting bogged down in this bikeshed? > Why is it a bike shed? Because we're spending way more time discussing what version number to pick than discussing the pros and cons of the bump itself. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message