Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 22:26:40 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> To: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r228808 - head/sys/cam/scsi Message-ID: <4EF39280.9030907@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4EF38D96.3040601@FreeBSD.org> References: <201112221640.pBMGeZod025237@svn.freebsd.org> <4EF375E5.2010809@FreeBSD.org> <4EF387F4.9050008@FreeBSD.org> <4EF3890B.6020408@FreeBSD.org> <4EF38D96.3040601@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 22/12/2011 22:05 Alexander Motin said the following: > On 22.12.2011 21:46, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> BTW, acd(4) ... not sure which tense I should use here ... used to create >> individual devices for each track - e.g. acd0t1, acd0t2 - where each track could >> have its own properties. > > Yes, I know. But that's a bigger blood, and I am not sure we need it. I am not > sure that this approach is correct for data tracks, as up to my present > understanding, later data tracks may address data on previous ones, so they can > not reside on different devices. For audio tracks it could be more useful, but > do you know applications using this? I have never researched this. -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4EF39280.9030907>