From owner-freebsd-current Tue Dec 25 8:28:43 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E402637B416 for ; Tue, 25 Dec 2001 08:28:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id fBPGQel10435; Tue, 25 Dec 2001 17:26:40 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Martin Blapp Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Can we use this ? Linux Interrupt Latency benchmark In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 24 Dec 2001 20:09:13 +0100." <20011224200503.D10383-100000@levais.imp.ch> Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2001 17:26:40 +0100 Message-ID: <10433.1009297600@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <20011224200503.D10383-100000@levais.imp.ch>, Martin Blapp writes: > >Hi all, > >ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/andrea/lil > >Maybe we can port this and use it to see where the >latency actually happens ? Doing something like that wouldn't be a bad idea. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message