From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 8 21:52:38 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AE8174D for ; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 21:52:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-gh0-f169.google.com (mail-gh0-f169.google.com [209.85.160.169]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0573E2F5 for ; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 21:52:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-gh0-f169.google.com with SMTP id r18so998687ghr.0 for ; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 13:52:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=seibercom.net; s=google; h=x-received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :reply-to:organization:x-mailer:face:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=bQrPV1Tc8a1oz6xaDBvkzSE8K1fr4g43QAlp08cBEA0=; b=KzZMIyWwqNk0k2EPCXWiZU1BAfnKJJl6ioqn+YRuUG4BSe0QSY0BbcqKUEma6N6eND jyV90j9zCK9QcoUS8Z/cyE1yJ11zXDuA9uLnjT8fDfy1FbaBoXC0nCYx5Ny7cdz/KeY6 UwDu84D/12jV8KxSnnMtS2AA4Pg10rdob9/vc= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :reply-to:organization:x-mailer:face:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=bQrPV1Tc8a1oz6xaDBvkzSE8K1fr4g43QAlp08cBEA0=; b=c6JBNoDXX/NGyXAzUzWj4L9Cb5bP5zfVWrFjr3yjFpe8DEgQnShRR32hpZDkcV6Xqy 7NrDrbum1OEAs550XMbzcbgwWxPGTt7MJfxlbKA1gl1vsAL4mKVHzhExD0xr086o1xIr oFaXOL0IIckDid3cTjMhoBmpjS5n6h1aMAhsHEHXtMTTRU6uX8Djk3fxHiejgPtSgJp8 94Z+4uN0wgVoH2lamQpfVfu8mcmSBf9ygdT1lR28wwvQOfmyUnV+Xq3w0StekONcC9ec VEeoqrpolNaJHw4yxqtQIVt3X/MHcL6zF27jzLZzY59Y9h5ony1/DGEE18cPPDfIyH4l YxoQ== X-Received: by 10.236.89.49 with SMTP id b37mr8200511yhf.33.1360360357320; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 13:52:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h3sm8737117ani.4.2013.02.08.13.52.36 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 08 Feb 2013 13:52:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3Z2qr350rJz2CG5n for ; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 16:52:35 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 16:52:35 -0500 From: Jerry To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: openssl broken Message-ID: <20130208165235.0dc7ac68@scorpio> In-Reply-To: References: <20130208154912.0b880f68@scorpio> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.3) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmLbTvRDMcrBZjZngf0zthMkMM3smvuBo2ZHbk96XjTo/7CshMU8i6R86Kp7ihdcSg6vP5Y X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 21:52:38 -0000 On Fri, 8 Feb 2013 21:03:07 +0000 (UTC) Michael Grimm articulated: > Jerry wrote: > > > I updated openssl on my system and ran into this bug: > > > > As noted numerous times on the openssl-dev list, OpenSSL 1.0.1d is > > broken. You need to grab > > > > and apply it to the 1.0.1d source to fix it. > > > > Will this patch be applied to the port version? > > I'd like to second that. I ran into this issue as well, breaking > dovecot, postfix and nginx. Thanks to zfs snapshots I've been able > to recover within seconds ;-) I heard that the nice folks who brought us "1.0.1d" will be coming out with "1.0.1e" any day now. The key words being "any day" now. Sometimes I really wonder if anyone actually tests this software before releasing it. Usually I never update any software to a new version until it has been in use for a while. However, since this was not a major update, but just a minor letter, I figured how badly could I get burnt. Once again, lady luck bit me in the ass. By the way, there is now a PR filed against it. Hopefully something will be done to correct the problem. I had to revert everything back to the old version. More time lost ... -- Jerry ♔ Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________