From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Feb 23 18:39:57 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: current@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2061F106575D;
	Mon, 23 Feb 2009 18:39:57 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from sippysoft.com (gk1.360sip.com [72.236.70.240])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D58DF8FC1C;
	Mon, 23 Feb 2009 18:39:56 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from [192.168.1.38] (S0106001372fd1e07.vs.shawcable.net
	[70.71.171.106]) (authenticated bits=0)
	by sippysoft.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n1NIdsQj010051
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Mon, 23 Feb 2009 10:39:55 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org)
Message-ID: <49A2ED6A.9040202@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 10:39:38 -0800
From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org>
Organization: Sippy Software, Inc.
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>
References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0902231000300.98609@fledge.watson.org>
	<200902231652.n1NGqMxH047731@post.behrens.de>
	<49A2DE9D.4090902@FreeBSD.org>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.0902231801450.92010@fledge.watson.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0902231801450.92010@fledge.watson.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Frank Behrens <frank@ilse.behrens.de>, Jeff Roberson <jeff@FreeBSD.org>,
	"current@freebsd.org" <current@FreeBSD.org>, stable@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: The machdep.hyperthreading_allowed & ULE weirdness in 7.1
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 18:39:59 -0000

Robert Watson wrote:
> In the mean time, it sounds like the sysctl does need to be 
> reimplemented or removed, but one question is how far to take it -- 
> caches are shared to varying degrees at varying levels of the topology.  
> However, I believe the recommendation has generally moved to disabling 
> hyperthreading using the BIOS, as that uses the vendor's notion of 
> hyperthreading.  The idea of changing the setting at run-time is 
> currently untenable because we don't have the OS infrastructure to take 
> CPUs out of service, although growing it would be useful in order to 
> support virtual machine dynamic CPU reconfiguration.

Well, as far as I know, what SCHED_4BSD does is simply stopping 
scheduling threads to the logical core(s). One doesn't need 
infrastructure to take CPU off-line for doing the same in SCHED_ULE.

Unfortunately access to BIOS is not always an option and also some 
BIOSes don't even provide a feature to turn HTT off.

-Maxim