Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 03 Oct 2012 17:37:11 +0400
From:      Ruslan Mahmatkhanov <cvs-src@yandex.ru>
To:        Volodymyr Kostyrko <c.kworr@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-python@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: py-distribute update leftover
Message-ID:  <506C3F87.7080901@yandex.ru>
In-Reply-To: <506C3E01.5020403@gmail.com>
References:  <506C1F7F.9020405@gmail.com> <506C2B80.70204@yandex.ru> <506C3733.7000903@gmail.com> <506C3B67.6090501@yandex.ru> <506C3E01.5020403@gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote on 03.10.2012 17:30:
> 03.10.2012 16:19, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote:
>>> PPS: This is the only bad thing in switching to py-distribute -
>>> everything else works: trac, viewvc, others...
>>
>> The main problem as for me is that this two systems conflicting. And we
>> have some amount of ports that need to be fixed before trying to ever do
>> distribute exp-runs - the ones that depend on setuptools directly, not
>> via USE_PYDISTUTILS (most of trac ports for example).
>
> Hmm, if I will come up with a patch would that count?
>
> I'm already running patched trac locally and everything I had done was
> just unhardcoding setuptools dependency.

Sure, please do, I started it couple of months ago, but never finished.

-- 
Regards,
Ruslan

Tinderboxing kills... the drives.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?506C3F87.7080901>