From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 18 18:25:56 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ED67106566C for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 18:25:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rmacklem@uoguelph.ca) Received: from esa-jnhn.mail.uoguelph.ca (esa-jnhn.mail.uoguelph.ca [131.104.91.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 495448FC14 for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 18:25:56 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ap8EAAPdL1CDaFvO/2dsb2JhbABFhgG1RIIgAQEBAwEBAQEgKx0DCwUWGAICDRkCKQEJJgYIBwQBEwkEh2YGC6ZCki+BIYoEhWaBEgOTJYIrgRSOfoJ9gUU X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,791,1336363200"; d="scan'208";a="175844829" Received: from erie.cs.uoguelph.ca (HELO zcs3.mail.uoguelph.ca) ([131.104.91.206]) by esa-jnhn-pri.mail.uoguelph.ca with ESMTP; 18 Aug 2012 14:24:49 -0400 Received: from zcs3.mail.uoguelph.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by zcs3.mail.uoguelph.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC2C179451; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 14:24:47 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 14:24:47 -0400 (EDT) From: Rick Macklem To: Pavel Bychykhin Message-ID: <1800872199.811272.1345314287909.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca> In-Reply-To: <502FD583.9070105@hte.vl.net.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [172.17.91.201] X-Mailer: Zimbra 6.0.10_GA_2692 (ZimbraWebClient - FF3.0 (Win)/6.0.10_GA_2692) Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Some of ZFS ACLs doesn't work as expected X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 18:25:56 -0000 Pavel Bychykhin wrote: > Dear community! > > After my experiments with ZFS, I concluded, that permissions > "delete_child" and "delete" are ignored. > For the create/update/delete operation a list of "rwxp" > (read_data/write_data/execute/append_data) is fully sufficient. > > No need to specify the "delete_child" and "delete" permissions at all, > or I don't understand something? > I'm no acl expert, but I'm not sure anyone knows what "delete" means for a POSIX fs that supports multiple hard links. Those ACL flags are in NFSv4 to make them windows compatible. Others will hopefully know more w.r.t. ZFS ACL specifics, rick > Thanks in advance. > > -- > Best regards, > Pavel > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-fs@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"