From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Feb 3 7:35:18 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by builder.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C148F3E1D for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2000 07:35:14 -0800 (PST) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id JAA61547; Thu, 3 Feb 2000 09:35:19 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2000 09:35:19 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: "Art Neilson, WH7N" Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: BerkeleyDB 1.85 Message-ID: <20000203093519.A60799@dan.emsphone.com> References: <3.0.6.32.20000202195523.00915db0@pop-server.hawaii.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <3.0.6.32.20000202195523.00915db0@pop-server.hawaii.rr.com>; from "Art Neilson, WH7N" on Wed Feb 2 19:55:23 GMT 2000 X-OS: FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In the last episode (Feb 02), Art Neilson, WH7N said: > application I'm developing. I'm unsure if 3.0.55 will build correctly > with modules of the same name residing in the standard system libc > library Berkeley DB 1.85, 2.*, and 3.* all use completely different function names to access the database (dbopen, db_open, db_env_create), so you won't have any conflicts with the system libraries. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@emsphone.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message