Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2003 10:05:16 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG, smp@FreeBSD.ORG, jhb@FreeBSD.ORG, jake@FreeBSD.ORG, tanimura@FreeBSD.ORG, alc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Need help fixing lock ordering with filedesc, proc and pipe. Message-ID: <200301031805.h03I5Gt8064163@apollo.backplane.com> References: <20030103030805.GS26140@elvis.mu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hmm. There seem to be multiple issues here but would defering the
psigio also be a workable solution? That is, simply add a flag to
the filedesc and return and the caller (or his caller) is responsible
for checking the flag and calling psigio in a more controlled situation.
This way sigio can be initiated deep in the code without any worries.
-Matt
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200301031805.h03I5Gt8064163>