Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 27 Apr 2008 15:43:09 +0930
From:      Malcolm Kay <malcolm.kay@internode.on.net>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Cc:        =?iso-8859-1?q?Micha=EBl_Gr=FCnewald?= <michael.grunewald@laposte.net>
Subject:   Re: Distributing makefiles
Message-ID:  <200804271543.09429.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net>
In-Reply-To: <481416AC.9010600@laposte.net>
References:  <481416AC.9010600@laposte.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 03:31 pm, Micha=EBl Gr=FCnewald wrote:
> Hi all,
>=20
> I am planning to distribute some of the makefiles I wrote on various
> platforms, including FreeBSD. I need the help of some insightful soul to
> take a few decisions:
>=20
> --- Where to install? I think /usr/local/share/mk is fine;
> --- How to install? Users should put a
>      `.MAKEFLAGS: -I/usr/local/share/mk'
> statement in their /etc/make.conf, are ports scripts allowed to do this
> automagically? If yes what's the best way to do this? (an ed script?)
> --- Being system or not? BSD Make has two search pathes, the system one
> (whith <> style inclusion) and the other one (with "" style incusion). I
> think I shall consider my files non system, preserving the <> pathes for
> BSD. But ther may be some pros and cons I am not aware.

I think you are confusing make with the C language with respect to search=20
paths. I believe make only uses search paths other than the current directo=
ry
when specificly requested for example with VPATH.

Regards,
Malcolm=20

>=20
> Note: I did submit this questions on `ports' about ten days ago, but I=20
> did not receive any answer for this. People subscribed to `ports' will=20
> see this message for the second time, I apologize for the annoyance.
>=20
> Any comments welcome,
> --
> cheers,
> Micha=EBl
>=20



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200804271543.09429.malcolm.kay>