Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 14:07:37 +0800 From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Zaphod Beeblebrox <zbeeble@gmail.com>, Bob Bishop <rb@gid.co.uk> Cc: FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: We do serial differently. Message-ID: <a77b536b-af83-e0a5-5773-9715518a42cf@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <CACpH0MedYovbo=0begdynjG1RQV91et%2B%2BePCN5voLefyMmSH9g@mail.gmail.com> References: <CACpH0Md0ckYH6k5ufAwCoc-_ThtJHrV9%2BdUtp66%2BSSjVuyhpxA@mail.gmail.com> <E94C8886-3282-432F-A46E-ED0DA83F7B18@gid.co.uk> <CACpH0MedYovbo=0begdynjG1RQV91et%2B%2BePCN5voLefyMmSH9g@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 20/10/17 12:31 am, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote: > On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 6:03 AM, Bob Bishop <rb@gid.co.uk> wrote: > >> All implementations of virtualised serial ports should (IMHO) provide a >> software ‘breakout box’ which is the only sure way of diagnosing this sort >> of problem. >> >> > netgraph for serial ports? we had that at one stage > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?a77b536b-af83-e0a5-5773-9715518a42cf>