From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 28 17:52:58 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 012A110656BC for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 17:52:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.92.78.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B11F88FC18 for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 17:52:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 01FF82845F; Thu, 28 Feb 2008 12:52:57 -0500 (EST) To: "B. Cook" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <0AAFAC92-CF83-42CC-A148-FB24261A4556@poughkeepsieschools.org> <47C6EE06.4010403@bsdforen.de> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 12:52:56 -0500 In-Reply-To: <47C6EE06.4010403@bsdforen.de> (Dominic Fandrey's message of "Thu\, 28 Feb 2008 18\:23\:18 +0100") Message-ID: <44y79555on.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Subject: Re: Upgrading to 7 from 6.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 17:52:58 -0000 Dominic Fandrey writes: > B. Cook wrote: >> Hello All, >> >> I was going to try and update a box from 6.3 to 7 via buildworld all >> 32 bit, nothing 64. >> >> Assuming it should be done like this: >> >> make buildworld >> make buildkernel >> mergemaster -p >> make installkernel >> (reboot) >> (startup on 7 kernel) >> make installworld >> mergemaster (do full mergemaster) >> make installworld >> (reboot) >> >> (make sure all is working in 7 then do it all again; just to be sure) >> make buildworld >> make buildkernel >> make installkernel >> make installworld >> >> >> Sound about right? or too redundant? >> >> Thanks in advance. > > The doing it all again part might bring some very slight performance > improvements due to the compiler change. It *shouldn't* make any difference; buildworld bootstraps its own compiler as one of the first things it does. None of the steps really need to be done more than once. The redundancy as described isn't harmful, either.