From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 21 20:47:12 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B314E16A418 for ; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 20:47:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FD3613C46A for ; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 20:47:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.22]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 21 Sep 2007 16:47:02 -0400 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.8.3-GA) with ESMTP id NUR43556; Fri, 21 Sep 2007 16:47:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 65-78-26-179.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([65.78.26.179]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 21 Sep 2007 16:47:01 -0400 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18164.11716.377920.986490@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 16:47:00 -0400 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <46F421A9.1090102@hdk5.net> References: <46F41ABC.70802@hdk5.net> <20070921153237.cec72878.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <46F421A9.1090102@hdk5.net> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Subject: Re: OpenOffice Java downloads X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 20:47:12 -0000 NetOpsCenter writes: > Bill Moran wrote: > >Is there any reason you can't use OOo 2.X? > > So I really dont care what the version is so long as the file > names reflect what the freebsd install error 1 gives when it > finishes its part. 1) Have you asked on the openoffice@ mailing list? 2) I'm with Bill - about the only reason to prefer 1.1 to 2.2.1 is lack of disk space. 3) I know from experience a suitable jdk is required (at least during compilation) for the 2.x series to handle OpenDocument formats. But the last I heard, it handles other formats natively. Robert Huff