From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 25 02:35:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A3311065672 for ; Tue, 25 May 2010 02:35:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (marcuscom-pt.tunnel.tserv1.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f00:ffff::1279]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7D7D8FC12 for ; Tue, 25 May 2010 02:35:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:1f00:2464::4] (shumai.marcuscom.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f00:2464::4]) by creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o4P2a3QV027029; Mon, 24 May 2010 22:36:03 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: Garrett Cooper In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-tviJ9nNKcFlYKYesPItH" Organization: MarcusCom, Inc. Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 22:36:09 -0400 Message-ID: <1274754969.95620.7.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.1.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HELO_NO_DOMAIN, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on creme-brulee.marcuscom.com Cc: gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: devel/gobject-introspection - has semi-fluid pkg-plist contents X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 02:35:58 -0000 --=-tviJ9nNKcFlYKYesPItH Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2010-05-24 at 02:40 -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote: > Hi Gnome folks, > I recently tried to run make package-recursive on > editors/openoffice.org-3 for some testing and I unfortunately got hung > up on making a package out of devel/gobject-introspection. One of the > bits (the xrandr stuff) appeared to be dynamically compiled based on > the automake stuff that I saw (since my chroot didn't have xrandr > installed), but I figured that I should consult the experts first. > Are all of the optional packages being properly addressed in > pkg-plist? If not, then I have a starter patch to work with, but I'd > need some guidance as to what all needs to be done to detect potential > issues with conditionally installed bits. As far as I know there are no known packaging problems with gobject-introspection. Everything should be getting installed properly. Joe --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-tviJ9nNKcFlYKYesPItH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAkv7N5YACgkQb2iPiv4Uz4e4bwCdFBfe1Oan4LWETiO7PLFkSDTh RqAAoI9pGQw5LGsQi5G+Cizzo3dhnwoU =Cdo0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-tviJ9nNKcFlYKYesPItH--