From owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 2 16:57:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93E2716A4D1 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 16:57:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from pilchuck.reedmedia.net (pilchuck.reedmedia.net [209.166.74.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38F1843D41 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 16:57:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from reed@reedmedia.net) Received: from reed by pilchuck.reedmedia.net with local-esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 1AyKh2-0002WL-00; Tue, 02 Mar 2004 16:57:00 -0800 Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 16:57:00 -0800 (PST) From: "Jeremy C. Reed" To: ".VWV." In-Reply-To: <001c01c400ae$d4274770$7a30fea9@workstation> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: workstations aren't always the same as desktops X-BeenThere: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Evangelism List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 00:57:06 -0000 On Wed, 3 Mar 2004, .VWV. wrote: > need are emulators and compatibility layers, in order to run on the the same > host o.s. multiple guest o.s. for the use of several commercial > applications. FreeBSD unfortunately lacks of support from VMWare. I have been using bochs off and on the past couple months. It works fine for me (although slow). I don't use vmware. For those who use bochs and vmware, how do they compare? Jeremy C. Reed http://www.reedmedia.net/