From owner-freebsd-questions Sat May 11 11:55:37 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id LAA03544 for questions-outgoing; Sat, 11 May 1996 11:55:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relay-1.mail.demon.net (relay-1.mail.demon.net [158.152.1.140]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id LAA03527 for ; Sat, 11 May 1996 11:55:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jraynard.demon.co.uk ([158.152.42.77]) by relay-1.mail.demon.net id aa12989; 11 May 96 19:55 +0100 Received: (from fqueries@localhost) by jraynard.demon.co.uk (8.6.12/8.6.12) id TAA29663; Sat, 11 May 1996 19:48:50 GMT Date: Sat, 11 May 1996 19:48:50 GMT From: James Raynard Message-Id: <199605111948.TAA29663@jraynard.demon.co.uk> To: matt@bdd.net CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-reply-to: (message from Matthew Stein on Sat, 11 May 1996 02:32:11 -0400 (EDT)) Subject: Re: xterm seems to require group wheel Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >>>>> Matthew Stein writes: > > I just noticed another odd thing on my FreeBSD system. xterm's run fine, > when the user is in group wheel. When the user isn't in group wheel, they > seg-fault. > > Has anyone encountered this? The privs, mode, and binary are exactly as > they are on another system here where the xterms work fine. Have you compiled a kernel without the COMPAT_43 option? This can cause weird things to happen with xterms.