Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 27 Dec 1999 13:13:49 -0500 (EST)
From:      "Chris D. Faulhaber" <jedgar@fxp.org>
To:        John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com>
Cc:        stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Huge differences in suid programs ?
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.10.9912271309570.1863-100000@pawn.primelocation.net>
In-Reply-To: <199912271808.KAA02918@vashon.polstra.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 27 Dec 1999, John Polstra wrote:

> In article <Pine.BSF.4.10.9912271204070.1402-100000@pawn.primelocation.net>,
> Chris D. Faulhaber <jedgar@fxp.org> wrote:
> > 
> > OTOH, if you set:
> > 
> > INSTALL=install -C
> > 
> > in /etc/make.conf, unchanged files will not have their modification time
> > changed.
> 
> That's right, but it's more in the spirit of the make infrastructure
> to set COPY = -C and leave INSTALL alone.
> 

Makes sense.  I was just going by the examples in
/etc{/defaults}/make.conf. If COPY is more correct, should
/etc{/defaults}/make.conf be changed?

-----
Chris D. Faulhaber - jedgar@fxp.org - jedgar@FreeBSD.org
--------------------------------------------------------
FreeBSD: The Power To Serve   -   http://www.FreeBSD.org



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.9912271309570.1863-100000>